|
The twelve first vignettes seem to
refer to his spiritual lineage, as a series of masters are represented,
maybe among them
Padmasambhava, Damarupa, Dusum khyenpa
( the first Karmapa ) and Karma phakshi ( the second Karmapa ). The thirteenth
vignette clearly tells of his birth on a house roof in Southern Tibet as
well as it alludes to the vision of Dam-pa sangs-rgyas penetrating him
in the shape of a rainbow. Numerous references are then made concerning
his education and the spiritual knowledge he is taught. At the age of five,
he encounters his former disciple, U-rgyen-pa, now his master, who initiated
him to varicus cyclesamong which the Samvara tantra. His visions of Ekajati
and Mahakala are depicted as well as the story of the dead tree which grows
into a beautiful one afferhe replants it. The followingstories are also
illustrated: his initiation to the Maitreya's five doctrines, the Padmasambhava's
apparition, his comprehension of astrology and the ensuing treatise, the
founding of an hermitage and the welcoming of the gods in the course of
his wanderings. The lower row of vignettes should be read from right to
left and probably celebrates his desth, showing him in a divine world.
He is presented preaching next to the Buddha, then celebrating rites together
with several divinities under the leadership of Vajradhara, then facingtwo
stupas symbolizinghis twopreviaus incarnations, and then in an architectural
structure together with Manjusri and Avalokiteshvara. The last four vignettes
feature the Buddha, an adorned Vairocana, Amitabha and the Buddha again.
This four representations refer to the divine
world where the Karmapa stays before
his next reincarnation ( Amitabha is the Buddha of endless life ) but above
all they fill up left over space in the composition.
Rangjung dorje is seated on a throne
with a temple architecture background, ornate with mythical animals. The
throne is resting on a lotus stem, emerging from a ritual vase supported
by two Nagas. A very refined vegetal ornament arises above the rainbow
which encompasses the monk. This central part of the thangka refers directly
to the Indian Pala painting, the archetype for Tibetan art as early as
the eleventh century. Its vecy specific style is linked to a small group
of paintings usually said to originate from Western Tibet. The most famous
among these is a monk portrait kept at the Los Angeles County Museum (inv.
M. 80.188). The backgrounds of the hundred and thirteen vignettes are painted
in red,blue and green therefore attestingoftheir links with Nepalese painting.
As well as in the above mentioned Sakyashri painting, the monk is depicted
according to the Indian pictorial traditions whereas the vignettes all
around him are directly taken affer the Newari tradition, known since the
thirteenth century. In this tradition the main divinity is surrounded by
varicus anecdotes and legends showing its power and the efficiency of its
ritual. Beyond this Newari structure and the rendering of certain figures,
most of the vignettes here directly refer to illustrationsofPala manuscripts
from which a typical Tibetan painting style originated with Nepalese elements
reviving the drained international Pala tradition.
On a vignette located on the outmost
right row, Rangung dorje is seated in an architectural structure surrounded
by nine Buddhas drawn in black on a golden background. We are probably
dealing here with the beginning of a new technique which later on will
be used to paint whole thangkas.
Though painted a few decades later
than Sakyashri, this portrait of the Third Karmapa shows pecularities in
the rendering, attesting only of a different geographical origin. The above
mentioned links referring to the monk portrait kept in Los Angeles, suggest
a Western Tibet provenance. This attribution is supported by many stylistic
similarities with the muralsofthe LhakangSoma inAlchi(Ladakh) and a fewother
temples in the region. The date of these murals has been the object of
a dispute for fiffeen years. This thangka probably paintod around 1350,
supports the evidence that this specific «archaic» style was
still well alive in this region in the middle of the fourteenth century.
Àt the same time the Newari school was already fashionable in Central
Tibet.
This superb narrative painting might
be considered as the precursor of the famous thangka representing Milarepa's
life, kept at the Los Angeles County Museum (M. 81.99.2). This Milarepa
may be dated in the fifteenth century and may also come from Western Tibet.
The three paintings, the Milarepa, the little monk, both kept in Los Angeles,
and our Karmapa belong to the Kagyupa order. Their common geographical
provenance may suggest the existence of a local pictorial school.
|